Sunday, March 21, 2010

Bible Study in Public Schools -- Two Oklahoma Bills that Need Time-Out






graphic from: http://www.brucefeiler.com/blog/2007_03_01_archive.html


Bible Study in Public Schools -- Two Oklahoma Bills that Need Time-Out


Oklahoma chapter -- www.okau.org
National AU office -- www.au.org

Dear First Amendment Separationists:

Below you'll find a summary of two important bills that are pending in the Oklahoma legislature. The SB1338 was originally introduced by Sen Ivester, but as we know, once thrown in the hopper of the legislative mill, centrist ideas quickly morph beyond all recognition.

Such is the case SB1338.

The language of HB2321 has also morphed from an opportunity for a reasonable educational elective class into a dogmatic requirement for
the use of the explicit word "Christian" to be used.

The respective committees to which these bills have been assigned will likely hold hearings this week of March 22.

Please contact your legislator, both senator and representative, by phone as time is critical. You can use the talking points outlined below as the office assistant won't have much patience with anything longer. You can Identify your legislators and obtain all other contact information:
http://www.lsb.state.ok.us/ .


Bible Study in Public Schools


SB 1338 mandates that courses use curriculum materials created by the National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools, a curriculum that has been ruled unconstitutional by a Federal court in Gibson v. Lee County School Board.


The founder of NCBCP, Elizabeth Ridenour has stated the reason for creating this curriculum is “to expose the kids to the biblical Christian worldview.”


Bible study in public schools must be taught in a secular, objective and academic manner, as well as expose students to critical perspectives on the bible and diversity of biblical interpretations. This bill does not do that.


Mark Chancey, a biblical studies professor at Southern Methodist University, as well as other biblical scholars and religious organizations have determined that the NCBCPS curriculum contains a distinct pro-Christian agenda and fails to meet scholarly standards.


It is unconstitutional under Sec. II-5 of the Oklahoma Constitution to expend public money to advance religion, which this bill clearly does.


For these reasons, this bill should be rejected.


________________________________________________________________


HB 2321 was amended to refer only to the Christian Bible, thus eliminating numerous other bible versions and translations from study.


Including “Christian” before every single reference to the Bible is clear evidence of a religious purpose in passing this bill.


Thus, this bill has the obvious purpose of promoting Christianity, which is unconstitutional under both the US Constitution and Sec. II-5 of the Oklahoma Constitution prohibiting the expenditure of public money to advance religion.


For these reasons, this bill should be rejected.

Monday, March 8, 2010

Bible Bill Specifically Names Unconstitutional Material


Bible Bill Specifically Names Unconstitutional Material
for Public School Students
Senate Bill 1338



In last week's Huffington Post there was an artilce reporting the Oklahoma Surpeme Court's displeasure with the Oklahoma Legilsture deliberate waste of tax money by passing blataltly unconstututional bills into law.

You can read it here: http://tinyurl.com/yah7hzn

And so what does the Oklahoma Senate do the very next week? You guessed it! They kept on with their wasteral ways!

This is from Rob Abiera, an OKC activist:

I hereby strongly recommend to everyone who has any reservations about this
bill whatsoever: NOW is the time to contact your state representative and
let him or her know how you feel about this! This bill has made it through
the state senate and is now headed to the state house. Go to
http://www.lsb.state.ok.us/ to find your representative and their contact info. A phone call is quickest - email is the best bet for those of you who want to compose your thoughts before sending them off. Snail mail is the least timely option here.

I also recommend contacting House Speaker Chris Benge & it wouldn't hurt to
include Governor Henry as well - but your first priority should be your own
state representative.

As soon as I have information about committee assignments I will pass it
along.

Rob Abiera
[OKC activist]

http://www.tulsaworld.com/opinion/article.aspx?subjectid=61&articleid=20100308_61_A13_Thepro257902

or http://tinyurl.com/ydzgq8h

Careful

by: World's Editorial Writers
Monday, March 08, 2010
3/8/2010 7:26:43 AM

The proposal to teach elective courses on the Bible in Oklahoma public
schools is another step closer. And the closer this gets to becoming law,
the more caution must be taken.

The Oklahoma Senate overwhelmingly passed Senate Bill 1338 last week, 38-4.
That is no surprise. One has to wonder if the vote was an endorsement of
teaching the Bible as history and literature or a vote to not be branded as
anti-Bible come election day.

snip--

One part of the bill that is of great concern is the authorization of course
materials from the National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools.
That organization claims that its curriculum is in 532 school districts in
38 states, serving more than 360,000 students.

A 2005 study out of Southern Methodist University found that the National
Council promotes a fundamentalist Protestant interpretation of the Bible,
often ignoring other beliefs such as those of Catholics, Jews and even
mainline Protestants. Critics claim that it teaches as historic truth the
stories of the Exodus, the flood, the destruction of the Tower of Babel and
the resurrection of Jesus.

There are other sources of course materials. One is the Bible Literacy
Project that sets strict guidelines. We hope the House takes a closer look
at alternative sources.

snip--

We share the concerns of the four Democrats who voted against the Senate
bill — Tom Adelson, Tulsa; Judy Eason McIntyre, Tulsa; Andrew Rice, Oklahoma
City; and Jim Wilson, Tahlequah. The Legislature and schools must guard
against any group seeing this as an opportunity to promote a religious
viewpoint in the public schools.

snip--

Copyright © 2010, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Haskell County Monument Goes Traveling -- "Adultry" is Not the Issue


Court Declines Review Of Appellate Decision That Ten Commandments Monument Improperly Endorses Religion

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
ACLU.org
March 1, 2010

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Supreme Court today let stand a federal appeals court ruling that that a government-sponsored Ten Commandments monument placed on a county courthouse lawn is unconstitutional and must be removed. By rejecting an appeal by the commissioners of Haskell County, Oklahoma, and declining to review the case, the Supreme Court left undisturbed a unanimous June 2009 decision by the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals that the county commissioners sought to promote their personal religious beliefs by erecting the monument. The lawsuit was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Oklahoma on behalf of a local resident.

“The Tenth Circuit’s decision was an important victory for religious freedom and we are pleased that the Supreme Court left that ruling undisturbed,” said Daniel Mach, Director of the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief. “Churches and private citizens, of course, are free to erect religious monuments on their property, but when the government places a religious symbol on government property, it sends an improper religious message – one forbidden by the Constitution.”

In its June 2009 decision, the federal court of appeals ruled that the monument violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution because a "reasonable observer would view the monument as having the impermissible principal or primary effect of endorsing religion." The monument is unconstitutional, the court held, because the proposal to erect the monument, its approval by the Haskell County Board of Commissioners and the commissioners' expressly religious defense of the monument "strongly reflect a government endorsement of religion.”

“The government should not be in the business of promoting religious viewpoints,” said Joann Bell, Executive Director of the ACLU of Oklahoma. “All Oklahomans, of all creeds – and not just those who share the beliefs of those in power – should feel welcome at the county courthouse."

The ACLU and the ACLU of Oklahoma filed a lawsuit challenging the display of the monument in October 2005, a little over a year after the Haskell County Board of Commissioners approved its placement on the county courthouse lawn. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma ruled against the plaintiffs in August 2006, prompting an appeal to the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Tenth Circuit reversed the decision, unanimously ruling in favor of plaintiffs, and later rejected defendants’ petition for a rehearing en banc, i.e., in front of all of the court’s judges.

Lawyers on the case include Mach, Heather L. Weaver of the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief, Charles S. Thornton of the ACLU of Oklahoma, and cooperating counsel Micheal Salem of Salem Law Offices.

Additional information about the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief is available online at: www.aclu.org/religion






--------------------------

Tulsa World article:

Ten Commandments monument to come down soon
This follows news that the U.S. Supreme Court won't hear the case.



http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=11&articleid=20100302_12_A1_STIGLE945571

Saturday, February 13, 2010

How Christian Were the Founders?


Montage by Carin Goldberg
Original Image: “‘Declaration of Independence,” by John Trumbull/The Bridgeman Art Library


complete at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/14/magazine/14texbooks-t.html?em

EXCERPT: LAST MONTH, A WEEK before the Senate seat of the liberal icon Edward M. Kennedy fell into Republican hands, his legacy suffered another blow that was perhaps just as damaging, if less noticed. It happened during what has become an annual spectacle in the culture wars.

.......

Finally, the board considered an amendment to require students to evaluate the contributions of significant Americans. The names proposed included Thurgood Marshall, Billy Graham, Newt Gingrich, William F. Buckley Jr., Hillary Rodham Clinton and Edward Kennedy. All passed muster except Kennedy, who was voted down.

This is how history is made — or rather, how the hue and cry of the present and near past gets lodged into the long-term cultural memory or else is allowed to quietly fade into an inaudible whisper. Public education has always been a battleground between cultural forces; one reason that Texas’ school-board members find themselves at the very center of the battlefield is, not surprisingly, money. The state’s $22 billion education fund is among the largest educational endowments in the country. Texas uses some of that money to buy or distribute a staggering 48 million textbooks annually — which rather strongly inclines educational publishers to tailor their products to fit the standards dictated by the Lone Star State. California is the largest textbook market, but besides being bankrupt, it tends to be so specific about what kinds of information its students should learn that few other states follow its lead. Texas, on the other hand, was one of the first states to adopt statewide curriculum guidelines, back in 1998, and the guidelines it came up with (which are referred to as TEKS — pronounced “teaks” — for Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills) were clear, broad and inclusive enough that many other states used them as a model in devising their own. And while technology is changing things, textbooks — printed or online —are still the backbone of education.

complete at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/14/magazine/14texbooks-t.html?em

Saturday, February 6, 2010

AU 2010 Agenda

The 2008 election results led some to think the battle to maintain separation of church and state would ease up.

Far from it. If anything, Americans United is busier than ever! And there has never been a more important time to renew your membership by becoming a monthly donor or making a one-time renewal gift.

AU is still fighting tax aid to religion under the guise of the "faith-based" initiative.

AU is still working to defend our public schools, which remain under siege by aggressive Religious Right groups determined to force their dogma into the classroom.
AU is still standing up to sectarian pressure groups that have gained unprecedented influence over our nation’s laws.

AU is still battling controversial appropriations of your tax money to religious schools from members of Congress and state lawmakers.

Can I count on you to help Americans United continue this vital work in this new year?

Barry W. Lynn, AU Executive Director

P.S. Your renewal now is critical for our 2010 agenda. As a special thank-you, we're offering an option for you to receive a copy of the funny and informative book Holy Hullabaloos: A Road Trip to the Battlegrounds of the Church-State Wars for your donation of $60 or more. Please become a monthly donor or make a one-time renewal donation today!

© 2010 Americans United for Separation of Church and State
518 C Street NE, Washington, DC 20002
Unsubscribe or change your email preferences.

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Shout-Out for Successful Legislative Preview & Latest Action on Religion in Okla Public Schools


Readers,

Until we can get our Google Group going with your responses to the invitation, I'm taking the liberty of whetting your appetite for religious separation by posting two messages from our OKC president, Mike Fuller, and former executive secretary, Jim Huff.

1) Mike Fuller gives a thanks to those who attended and a shout-out to those who helped make our first Legislative Preview at the Senate chamber a success.

2) Jim Huff gives an update on the actions being taken in regard to Sen. Tom Ivester's bill, SB 1338 concerning the teaching of religious classes in Oklahoma Public Schools. It's in the safe-to-open attachment with this email.

Best wishes,

James Nimmo, communications chair/website moderator



1) ************************
Message from Mike Fuller, chair of OK AU, www.okau.org

By all accounts, our first ever "Legislative Preview Forum" was a resounding success. We had 44 very enthusiastic people in attendance and the discussion was very spirited and informative. In preparing for this event, we identified at least 26 bills and/or resolutions that we thought warranted scrutiny from from a church/state separation point of view. There were 3 bills dealing with teaching about the bible in public schools, no fewer than 8 dealing with abortion, 5 dealing with various schemes to siphon off tax money for private (religious) schools, 7 dealing with marriage and divorce and numerous miscellaneous bills on everything from changing the State Motto to "Oklahoma- In God We Trust!" to an embryo adoption bill.

Obviously, due to time limitations, we were not able to cover each of these bills. We kicked the Forum off with the 3 "Bible" bills (SB 1338, HB 2938 and HB 2938), presented by Tamya Cox from the local ACLU, followed by the "Freedom of Conscience bills (SB 1891 and HB 3110) presented by yours truly. Next up was the "Motto" bill (SR 56), presented by our Treasurer, Damion Reinhardt, followed by our VP Nick Singer presenting one of the 5 school bills. Wrapping up bill discussion was our Communications Committee Chair, Jim Nimmo with a discussion of HB 3408 about criminalizing unauthorized marriages. By that time, we just had 30 minutes left in the program so Nick Singer and our Secretary Jeanette Schreiber led the discussion on lobbying congress.

I want to thank everyone mentioned above, plus Dena Sher from National AU for providing us with great analysis and talking points on the various bills, Wanda Stapleton and Rob Abiera for their invaluable help in tracking church/state bills, and Darla Sheldon for helping to advertise this event. Without their help, this event would not have been possible. If anyone would like to learn more about the bills which were discussed at this event, plus those that weren't, check out the two links below.

Mike Fuller
President, OKAU
www.okau.org

2)***********
Advocates, Friends and Concerned Oklahomans,

This is a “shotgun” notice to as many people as possible. SB 1338 (Instructing the State Department of Education to develop guidelines and materials for Bible related classes in Public Schools) is moving pretty fast through the legislative committee process.

I believe the intent of the Bill has merit. Oklahoma does need guidelines from the State Department of Education that have been approved by the State Attorney General’s office to meet national and state constitutional requirements. BUT, IT IS NOT A PERFECT BILL. Several amendments would make it better.

1. There must be a requirement that the teacher is a CERTIFIED Oklahoma teacher.
2. The Teacher must be trained BEFORE the class instruction begins…NOT during the time the class is being taught.
3. The Bible MUST NOT BE the only text source used in the class.
4. The OTHER SOURCES must discuss the history of how the Bible Books came to be canonized (official). They did not fall from the sky in book form with “red letter” editions.
5. Following the State Department’s Guidelines and Materials (APPROVED BY the state Textbook committee), the individual district and the teacher conducting the class develop the SYLLABUS for the class.

Look the bill up at www.lsb.state.ok.us/. You can also locate Senator Ivester’ and other senator’s contact information at the same site.

Attached is the 2007 handout that I used to raise these issues with legislators during that session. At that time the proposed bill never got out of committee. Things may be different this time.

A visit to Sen. Ivester’s office with your written concerns, a brief letter with your concerns or an email message describing your concerns would all be useful in attempting to improve the bill. Also, messages to your own senator would alert them to the needed changes.

Jim Huff

Contact information for Sen. Ivester--
Capitol Address
Senator Tom Ivester
2300 N. Lincoln Blvd., Rm. 529A
Oklahoma City, OK 73105
(405) 521-5545
ivester@oksenate.gov
Executive Assistant: Pam McLerran

Roth takes on anti-gay shell bill

OU Daily has posted an insightful analysis of HB 3408, which (as currently drafted) would legislatively reaffirm the State's power to incarcerate religious leaders who exercise their constitutionally protected freedom of conscience to perform religious ceremonies for whomever they so choose.

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Church-State Watchdog Group Urges Obama To Keep Promise To Fix 'Faith-Based' Initiative



graphic courtesy of John Braly

On One-Year Anniversary Of Obama 'Faith-Based' Plan, President Should Ban Government-Funded Religious Bias And Proselytizing, Says AU


February 2, 2010

President Barack Obama should honor his pledge to reform the “faith-based” initiative by banning job discrimination in tax-funded programs and making it clear that public funds cannot support proselytizing, says Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

In a letter sent to Obama today, Americans United urged the president to reverse Bush-era faith-based policies that remain in effect today and follow through on reforms he proposed when he was a candidate.

“We’ve waited long enough,” said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, Americans United executive director. “The faith-based initiative has serious constitutional defects, and it’s time for a fix. Billions of federal tax dollars are going out the door without adequate religious liberty and civil rights safeguards.”

In a July 1, 2008, speech in Zanesville, Ohio, Obama promised to end Bush administration policies that allowed publicly funded faith-based social services to proselytize and discriminate in hiring on religious grounds.

Read the full press release at www.au.org

PDF Link to the letter delivered to President Obama and Attny-Gen. Eric Holder
http://www.au.org/media/press-releases/archives/2010/02/au-letter-to-obama-2-2-2010.pdf

Intolerant Agenda Of National Prayer Breakfast Sponsor


Americans United Speaks Out Against Intolerant Agenda Of National Prayer Breakfast Sponsor

AU’s Lynn Calls On Leader Of ‘The Family’ To Repudiate Extreme Anti-Gay Law In Uganda

February 2, 2010

Americans United for Separation of Church and State today deplored the intolerant agenda of “The Family,” a secretive Religious Right group that sponsors the annual National Prayer Breakfast.

At a Washington, D.C., press conference this morning, the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, Americans United executive director, joined religious leaders in criticizing The Family for its ties to David Bahati, a Ugandan legislator who is pushing a draconian anti-gay law.

The Family, also known as the Fellowship Foundation, sponsors the National Prayer Breakfast, which attracts the president and a large number of members of Congress each year, as well as foreign dignitaries. According to researcher Jeff Sharlet, Bahati is a member of The Family.

Lynn called on President Barack Obama, who is scheduled to attend the prayer breakfast, to condemn the Ugandan proposal, which calls for the execution of gays and the imprisonment of those who promote homosexuality.

Read the full press release at www.au.org

Monday, February 1, 2010

Federal Court Strikes Down Sectarian Prayers At Forsyth County, N.C., Commission


Watchdog Group Hails Decision Curbing Government Intervention In Religion



January 29, 2010

A federal court has struck down a North Carolina county’s policy of opening board meetings with sectarian prayers.

U.S. District Judge James A. Beaty held that the Forsyth County Board of Commissioners’ preference for Christian prayers violates the constitutional separation of church and state.

Observed Beaty, “[T]he prayers offered in the implementation of the Policy here did not reflect diversity and inclusiveness, and instead were divisive and had the effect of affiliating the Government with one particular belief.”

Plaintiffs in the Joyner v. Forsyth County lawsuit are Janet Joyner and Constance Lynn Blackmon, two county residents and members of the Winston-Salem Chapter of Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

complete at: http://www.au.org/media/press-releases/archives/2010/01/federal-court-strikes-down.html