Hat tip to Barbara Santee of Tulsa for this story
************************************************
David Barton is infamous for claiming the United States is a Christian
nation. He claims to have done a lot of “research” attempting to prove
this by taking quotes of the founding fathers out of context and using
them to make him look correct. Check out his biography at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Barton_(author)
From: Sightings <
divsightings@gmail.com>
Martin Marty Center for the Advanced Study of Religion
The University of Chicago Divinity School
Sightings 4/30/2012
David Barton’s Jefferson
-- Martin E. Marty
Our
premier historian of late colonial and early republican America, Gordon
Wood, while reviewing a book on Roger Williams warms up readers with
references to Thomas Jefferson. “It’s easy to believe in the separation
of church and state when one has nothing but scorn for all organized
religion. That was the position of Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson’s hatred
of the clergy and established churches knew no bounds. He thought that
members of the ‘priestcraft’were always in alliance with despots against
liberty. For him the divine Trinity “was nothing but ‘Abracadabra’ and
‘hocus-pocus’. . . Ridicule, he said, was the only weapon to be used
against it.”
If you wanted to promote the idea of “a
Christian America,” one which would privilege one religion, a version of
Christianity, and de-privilege all others, and if you want to get back
to roots and origins, the last of the “founding fathers” on whom you’d
concentrate would be Jefferson. Yet the most ardent public and pop
advocate of privilege and virtual establishment, David Barton, cites
Jefferson for Bartonian positions which are directly opposite of
Jefferson’s. Never heard of David Barton? Most of the historians you
would ever meet never heard of him, and if you told them about him and
his positions, they would yawn or rage about listing him among those who
deal honestly with Jefferson.
Sightingsdoes not
over-do ad hominem and sneering references, so we leave to others all
the disdaining that Barton so richly merits. Do note, however, that he
has invented a case and product which serve his viewpoint and draw him
enormous followings among “conservative” factions which oppose
separation of church and state in most cases except those they choose.
Listen to Mike Huckabee or Glenn Beck or rightist cable TV and you will
find Barton showing up everywhere.
His favorite founder
seems to be Jefferson, of all people. How does he work his way around to
the prime builder of “a wall of separation between church and state,”
in the metaphor that would not be my favorite. Sample: Thomas Jefferson,
razor in hand snipped all supernatural references out of his copies of
the Gospels (in the four languages he read in White House evenings), to
keep Jesus as a pure ethical humanist. This spring Barton is publishing
The Jefferson Lies, which most historians would title Barton’s Lies
about Jefferson. Astonishingly, he twists a slight reference to
Jefferson’s book on Jesus and turns it into a tract which, Barton says,
Jefferson would use in order to convert the Indians to Christianity.
Reviewer Craig Ferhman in the Los Angeles Times found all that Barton
found to be “outrageous fabrication.” On TV, Barton even said, with no
evidence, that Jefferson gave a copy of his Jesus book to a missionary,
to use “as you evangelize the Indians.” Had the Indians been converted
with that text, their heirs would have had no place to go but to what
became the humanist wing of the Unitarian-Universalist church.
Why
does any of this matter? One, basic honesty is at issue; do American
religionists need to invent such stories in order to prevail? Two, what
if they did prevail? Most of the founders thought that religion was most
honest and compelling when its leaders and gatherings did not depend
upon lies about the state and, of course, upon the state itself.
“Separation of church and state” is admittedly a complex issue, dealing
as it does with inevitable conflict and messiness in a free and lively
republic. May debates over it go on, but with honest references to
Jefferson and his colleagues and not on the grounds David Barton
proposes.
References
Gordon S. Wood, “Radical, Pure, Roger Williams <
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/may/10/radical-pure-roger-williams/?pagination=false> ,” New YorkReview of Books, May 10, 2012.
People for the American Way, “David Barton’s ‘Outrageous Fabrication’ about Thomas Jefferson <
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/david-bartons-outrageous-fabrication-about-thomas-jefferson> ,” Right Wing Watch, January 9, 2012.
Martin E. Marty's biography, publications, and contact information can be found at <
http://www.memarty.com/> www.memarty.com.
----------
This month’s Religion& Culture Web Forum features “ <
http://divinity.uchicago.edu/martycenter/publications/webforum/042012/Jasarevic%20Web%20Forum%20Final%20.pdf>
Three Lights on the Queen’s Face: On Mixing, Muddle, and Mêlée” by
Larisa Jasarevic. Jasarevic writes about encounters at a singularly
popular therapist in Bosnia, Nerka, whom patients have lovingly titled
“the Queen of Health.” In the midst of the new medical and magical
market, sorcery and Koranic healing appeal to people
inBosniairrespective of their religious backgrounds, upsetting the
conventional image of Bosniaas forever divided by
ethno-national-religious considerations. According to Jasarevic, Nerka
irreverently puts into play and displaces the differences reified since
the 1990s genocidal conflict. Beginning with Jean-Luc Nancy’s reluctant
writing on identity and mixing--provoked by the Bosnian war and
discourse of ethnic cleansing--Jasarevic's essay visits some local,
ritual, and habitual responses to magical, medical, and religious mixing
and paints a gathering around the impossibility of belonging. Read
<
http://divinity.uchicago.edu/martycenter/publications/webforum/042012/Jasarevic%20Web%20Forum%20Final%20.pdf> Three Lights on the Queen’s Face: On Mixing, Muddle, and Mêlée.
----------
Sightings comes from the <
http://divinity.uchicago.edu/martycenter/> Martin Marty Center for the Advanced Study of Religion at the University of Chicago Divinity School.
Submissions policy
Sightings
welcomes submissions of 500 to 750 words in length that seek to
illuminate and interpret the intersections of religion and politics,
art, science, business and education. <
http://divinity.uchicago.edu/martycenter/publications/sightings/>
Previous columns give a good indication of the topical range and tone
for acceptable essays. The editor also encourages new approaches to
current issues and events.
Attribution
Columns may be
quoted or republished in full, with attribution to the author of the
column, Sightings, and the MartinMarty Centerat the University of
Chicago Divinity School.
Contact information
Please send all inquiries, comments, and submissions to Shatha Almutawa, managing editor of Sightings, at
DivSightings@gmail.com> DivSightings@gmail.com. Subscribe, unsubscribe, or manage your subscription at the Sightings <https://lists.uchicago.edu/web/info/sightings> subscription page. Follow us on Twitter <http://twitter.com/#!/DivSightings> @DivSightings. Too many emails? Receive Sightings as an RSS feed. Sign up at <http://divinity.uchicago.edu/rss/sightings.xml> http://divinity.uchicago.edu/rss/sightings.xml.
Our mailing address is:
1025 East 58th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
tel: 773-702-8200 fax: 773-702-6048
Today's Sightings can be found at this URL:
http://divinity.uchicago.edu/martycenter/publications/sightings/archive_2012/0430.shtml
Copyright © 2011 The University of Chicago Divinity School, All rights reserved.
_____
